ona76

A reflective OU MBA study and action journal on management-related topics.

How to break free of the wrong career

with 4 comments


I’m so glad that I have found Herminia Ibarra (2002) articles. She has a lot of useful comments on personal and career development. She is also very practically focused, which suits my EBI requirements. Ibarra (2002) also has a different take on the whole career redevelopment approach, which is outlined in her Harvard Business Review article “How to stay Stuck in the Wrong Career.

Ibarra (2002) believes that instead of wasting too much time planning, analysing, and researching career change options, you should take action first and work through the results iteratively afterwards. Through an action-oriented approach you can adapt, regroup your thoughts, and reorient your pathway from real-life experience. This means that your career change is never a pipedream that is too risky to implement because you are actively pursuing change. You have real-life information on which to base a decision.

It’s also a good way of exploring our many different “selves”. Ibarra quotes research from cognitive psychologist Hazel Markus (1986), Possible Selves, which explores the idea of multiple adult identities formed in the present, past and future. Ibarra argues that her own research reflects this idea that we have many identities. Her career-change subjects identified job opportunities that arose from volunteer opportunities, married life, and networks outside of the workplace. Some subjects had wild ideas of becoming tour guides or scuba instructors whilst others found identities in the non-profit sector. Ibarra does not believe that we can find our one “true self” and that too much introspection will amount to nothing more than daydreams. It’s action that counts.

The approach Ibarra (2002) recommends in anyone’s career change action is called “the practice of working identity”. This is a practice of applying effort to reshape our identity. This skill is one that Ibarra (2002) says can be learned by anyone seeking professional renewal. She calls this the “test and learn” model of change.  Ibarra advocates three main ways of a working through a career-change process: crafting experiments, shifting connections, and making sense of your journey.

Through crafting experiments we can test out new activities and professional roles in small manageable ways. Find an opportunity to learn a new identity through a related work project, a volunteer option, further training, or by freelancing. Concrete experience is what is required if you really want to move in a new direction.

Although feedback is a good way of gaining insight into your personality and ways of working, in practice, people who are too close to us have their own biases and agendas. They can have a vested interest in keeping the status quo. Networking away from our friends and family and current workplace, shifting connections, can provide a necessary new perspective on what is achievable. It may even open you up to new possibilities that have not been considered.

Making sense of your change requires a narrative to explain your new direction. What triggered your epiphany? What were the defining moments? How did you get there? By creating a personal narrative, we can explain our new direction to others and believe in it ourselves. It also solidifies the action taken and defines your purpose.

Ibarra (2002) concludes that those that successfully reoriented their career pathway took smaller steps that allowed them to learn from experience. Nobody in her research followed a linear pathway. She states that most career transition takes three years and it must start with action.

Overall, Ibarra has given me lots to think about. Despite her research being based on only 39 career-change case studies, I think she has a point in stating that you must actually take action if you want to change. It links very nicely with Kolb and Fry (1975) experiential learning cycle, which is about learning from action, reflecting, and then implementing further change.

So far, I have already filled in an online career inventory with CASCAiD, http://www.cascaid.co.uk/ . That has given me a top 20 list of roles that it claims I am suitable for, some of the roles I have already thought were possible. I also have an MBTI profile. And I also have various opportunities to network with others either through volunteer opportunities or networking groups. I guess it is time to start taking action!

References

Ibarra H (2002). How to stay stuck in the wrong career. Harvard business review, 80 (12) PMID: 12510536

Kolb, D.A., & Fry, R. (1975). Towards an Applied Theory of experiential learning Theories of Group Processes, 33-57

Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible Selves American Psychologist, 42 (9), 954-969

 

Written by ona76

19/09/2011 at 10:26 am

4 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Hi

    I too like Ibarra’s ideas of career change.

    If you’re interested in this, have you come across the Chaos Theory of Careers? It contains similar ideas about the unpredictable, emergent nature of careers and the need for adaptability.

    https://careersintheory.wordpress.com/2010/03/17/puppies-and-ping-pong-balls/

    David Winter

    22/09/2011 at 6:50 am

    • Hi David, I haven’t heard of the Chaos Theory of careers – I’ll look it up over the next few days. Thanks!

      ona76

      25/09/2011 at 1:21 pm

  2. What is your MBTI type? I came out ENFP. There is a caveat with these things, using them as an excuse. I prefer KAI, far simpler, though I would prefer the less pejorative terms of ‘do things differently’ and ‘do different things’. At 144 I am well off the mean and deep inside ‘innovation’.

    Jonathan Vernon

    17/04/2012 at 6:51 am

  3. Hi Jonathan, I came out as an ENTJ on the MBTI. There was a lot in that profile that I could relate to, but you’re right, one has to be “cautious” in interpreting the results.

    I haven’t done a KAI properly, only working through his articles in Henry’s Creative Management & Development book. Btw- you should definitely re-read a lot of those articles for the B822 exam. The cognition & style chapters really pulled things together for me.

    The NEO had me down as very open & conscientious with lower extraversion and agreeableness compared to other B822 cohorts at the time 🙂 The results haven’t been published on the Cambridge/Open University joint BBC lab project yet. It’ll be interesting to see whether they can find some distinctive “types” from the national data.

    ona76

    17/04/2012 at 7:58 am


Leave a comment